Huawei wants to circumvent the US ban and could do so with a new brand

Make video surveillance keen again…. okay it doesn’t have the same band, simply this is definitely helping the industry, especially the premium brands with high end products. This will really hit home when local integrators who have been fiercely loyal to Hik begin to switch.

Go your popcorn prepare.

From the FB give-and-take of this post:

Could it be that Nelly’s (Surplus) is going to win both means? 😉

In all seriousness, it is an interesting questioning of what becomes of the gear. We will bank check for any government recommendations.

IPVM could have been a piddling clearer in stating they forged the photograph from an original that related to a $1.5m taxation overhaul package and has absolutely nothing to do with the ban.

Putting “IPVM analogy” on the bottom right corner doesn’t cut it and just demonstrates how tacky and cheap IPVM has become. Tabloid really is the correct clarification of this blazon of “journalism”.

Your response typifies the “anti-Hik” antechamber in personalising an individual assault – sanctioned past IPVM.

I’m not “anti-Hik”, per se, I but happen to believe their products are so severely flawed in terms of cyber security that they are not suitable for use in most commercial deployments. Further, I recollect that Hik has gone to not bad lengths to convince people, through blatantly deceptive and fraudulent presentations, that their products are not more or less secure than those of other companies. This is evidenced when I encounter claims similar your following statement:

More recently, Axis and genetic vulnerabilities are airbrushed to see them in some kind of positive light whereby anything at all by HIK/Dahua is trashed into anti-China rhetoric.

My stance is that you lack the ability to properly evaluate common vulnerabilities and their potential to exist exploited and impact a user or their network. My comments are non “personal”, just they are in response to your specific statements. If you want to phone call that some kind of “individual attack”, I judge you tin, but I would also say you have pretty thin skin.

Not anybody reading the commodity is from the IPVM community and will indeed believe what they have published in the context of the story.

I would say the boilerplate reasonable person reading this would accept seen enough Trump photoshops of him holding up altered signs and declarations to recognize the parody/satire element. If not, well, IPVM is catering to an audience that is overall informed and moderately skeptical, they can’t dumb and disclaimer every paradigm down to the lowest common denominator. If you read the text under the paradigm, I feel that yous get sufficient detail to evaluate the prototype properly. If you only “read” pictures, well, that is an entirely different issue.

The graphic existence misleading is indicative of Johns mission to exaggerate all things Hik

What is truly misleading most the image? Did Trump not in fact sign a bill that bans use of Hytera, Hikvision, and Dahua in government applications?

The facts are that exterior of the United states the NDAA is meaningless, lilliputian and entirely irrelevant.

Disagree. Outside of China (where Hik enjoys authorities preferences and similar bans severely limiting employ of strange surveillance products) Due north America is the largest market place in the security industry. Many manufacturers fund their overseas expansions off of their NA business. Banning Hik and Dahua in the US will make those companies weaker hither, and simultaneously strengthen others. That can easily have rolling global touch.

Simply jumping on Johns bandwagon to get “likes” and earn click dollars

I give two shits well-nigh who “likes” me, and y’all can upvote all my comments to infinity and it won’t alter my net worth by more than than a rounding error. My motivation is non at all related to either of those goals, I am simply trying to share insight and data.

 What is harder to do is to enter into reasoned debate

Just so I can keep runway, are you the pot or the kettle in the above statement?

Only hey – if school yard insults is your matter – so so be it.

At least you are consistent, taking a throw-away image or a throw-away statement and somehow coming abroad with the understanding that is the whole story.

Would this affect Us government projects exterior of the U.s.a.?

ie, United states customs preclearance at airports in Canada?

Thank yous, Charles. Much appreciated!

This airport I mentioned to a higher place received 9M in federal grants. I have not heard anything about them using any federal coin for this project. I did reach out to the city to see if they accept annihilation in identify that would prohibit some of this banned equipment being placed on their leased holding.